MIP3 UPDATE

I know all of us are waiting for any update on this but so far the message we received from CSS just this morning is that a clearance is still being requested. We will inform you at the soonest possible time of any information about this. Maraming salamat po.

atty james:

please dont be mad at me, last Feb 27, 2012, I wrote a letter addressed to HRMG Head Atty. Mon Cervantes quoting your opinion regarding the issue (without citing your name and area of course). i asked for their response about it. Yesterday i received a letter from ERD informing me that they have referred my letter to PAD for further study and they will inform me as soon as it is available.

thank you.

batman

"ANO NA NGA PALA ANG UPDATE SA ISSUE NA ITO"

meron bang good news????

May awa ang Dios merun..nag post si Blackman ng 4 smileys a while ago...that sure means something to be happy about...thank you Lord!

Maam sonia, thanks for the info. we will be hoping for good,,,

malamang meron tlaga tayong matatanggap sa april 30 or this coming friday...

atty james:

please dont be mad at me, last Feb 27, 2012, I wrote a letter addressed to HRMG Head Atty. Mon Cervantes quoting your opinion regarding the issue (without citing your name and area of course). i asked for their response about it. Yesterday i received a letter from ERD informing me that they have referred my letter to PAD for further study and they will inform me as soon as it is available.

thank you.

batman

"ANO NA NGA PALA ANG UPDATE SA ISSUE NA ITO"



the issue was mentioned during our annual convention last April 19, 2012 and HRMG Head Atty Cervantes instructed PAD Acting Head Atty Vallada to immediately answer the letter of blackman.
i believe that Atty Vallada will respond immediately.
thanks.

ano update on the subject, sir batman???

BLITZ wrote:

Ms Sonia has quoted:

Quote:
When asked about admonition and reprimand, he discussed lengthily on the disqualification of employees to receive MIP2 and MIP3 for both admonition and reprimand
.
What is the stated basis of the disqualification? If we are to read the excerpts of EO 13 provided by LBPEA, it was indicated in essence that after the final resolution of the case (meaning, there is an administrative case filed earlier against an employee), In case of exoneration or penalty of reprimand, any withheld MIP during the pendency of the case shall be paid.

This provision of EO 13 is crystal-clear, if one is charged administratively and later on found to be liable only for a penalty of reprimand, as stated in the EO, to repeat, he is entitled to receive any withheld MIP during the pendency of the case. In other words, a penalty of reprimand warrants the granting of MIP benefits.

If this is the case, what is then the legal basis in saying that employees who were admonished and reprimanded are disqualified?

An intelligent and straighforward explanation on this is needed. Marami pong salamat sa LBPEA NEB.

Sonia wrote:

Sir Blitz,
The argument you raised here was exactly the same argument raised by Atty. Semaj in his previous post in this website which was elevated to Atty. Joselito Vallada-Head Personnel Administration Department.

I made follow up yesterday-April 23 with Atty. Vallada on the issue and legal points raised on admonition and reprimand. In reply, he informed me that the matter will still have to be taken upon with Atty. Mon Cervantes.

Personally, I view this as an important legal issue which our management has to consider into or revisit its policy. But then our management has its hands full with the preparation and implementation of realignment in the bank some aspects of personnel concerns were temporarily set aside like the convening of Adhoc Committee for Items Agreed Upon for Discussion/Take up Outside CNA and also the issue raised by Atty. Semaj on the admonition and reprimand. Hence, we give allowance for possible delay on their action.

LBPEA will remind our management on this matter. Thank you!

"Sana nga pag-ukulan ito ng pansin ng management, not only for the benefit of those affected but for all us"employees of the bank""